Governance
Roles, criteria and decision making.

Governance and continuity
An ongoing framework for organizations that need to assess, prioritize, execute, and track accessibility across multiple areas or units.
More than an isolated intervention: accessibility incorporated into the organization's management.
Direct answer
It is a structured and ongoing initiative that brings together criteria, responsibilities, goals and monitoring to improve accessibility over time.
Unlike a specific action, the program connects diagnosis, planning, projects, execution, verification and updating. It is especially useful when the organization has many units or needs to integrate different internal areas.
Roles, criteria and decision making.
Standardized reading of areas and units.
Priorities and adaptation cycles.
Follow-up, evidence and review.
The program is the broadest and most continuous structure. Within it there may be adaptation plans to organize priorities and work plans to detail actions, responsible parties and deadlines for a specific cycle.
The program design is proportional to the size of the organization and should not create bureaucracy without practical use.
To size the service, inform the number and location of units, their different uses, existing diagnostics and which internal areas participate in decisions. A pilot can help test the method before scaling up the work.
The scope may provide for evaluation criteria, a matrix of responsibilities, review cycles and progress records. Comparisons between units must respect their differences: a corporate classification does not replace the technical analysis of each property.
Works, periodic visits, management systems and preparation of all projects in the network are not automatically included. The proposal defines the deliveries, monitoring frequency and responsibilities of Acessibilize and the organization.
O adaptation plan organizes intervention priorities. O work plan details actions and deadlines for each cycle. A accessibility consultancy can support specific decisions without requiring the structure of an ongoing program.
No, but it offers greater value when there are several units, responsible areas or adaptations distributed over time.
Yes. A representative unit or group can help test criteria before expansion.
May be organized into cycles, but typically includes ongoing monitoring and updating.
Multi-unit accessibility?
Structure criteria, responsibilities and evolution consistently.
Chat about the program